tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8883177.post1970355892986995114..comments2024-01-05T21:31:11.122-06:00Comments on The Town Crank: Now, doesn't this make sense?Steve Erbachhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05065643506800242801noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8883177.post-45316551178607337562007-03-03T19:22:00.000-06:002007-03-03T19:22:00.000-06:00Dear Mr. or Ms. Plum,The fact that the "only disse...Dear Mr. or Ms. Plum,<BR/><BR/>The fact that the "only dissenter" is Abdussamatov doesn't count for much. The established view is pretty much unassailable and the reportage of the global warming phenomena is strikingly blasé about dissenters.<BR/><BR/>"His views are completely at odds with the mainstream scientific opinion," said Colin Wilson, a planetary physicist at England's Oxford University. "And they contradict the extensive evidence presented in the most recent IPCC report."<BR/><BR/>The "evidence" was a report for policy makers...an executive summary. Have you not seen the reports that the data has yet to be molded to fit the conclusions in the policy report?<BR/><BR/>Global Warming is, as President Chirac of France says: "a wonderful way to introduce world socialism run by the UN."<BR/><BR/>Regards,<BR/><BR/>Steve Erbach<BR/>The Town CrankSteve Erbachhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05065643506800242801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8883177.post-17125416175161632902007-03-03T18:51:00.000-06:002007-03-03T18:51:00.000-06:00As the article says: The warming on Mars is caused...As the article says: The warming on Mars is caused by its tilt, while the warming on Earth is caused by the greenhouse effect. <BR/><BR/>The only dissenter mentioned in the article to this established explanation is Abdussamatov.Tony Leehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01793245303802414316noreply@blogger.com